Latest US word on Guantanamo Bay

Under the headline "U.S. Says It Fears Detainee Abuse in Repatriation" the New York Times reports

A long-running effort by the Bush administration to send home many of the terror suspects held at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, has been stymied in part because of concern among United States officials that the prisoners may not be treated humanely by their own governments, officials said.

Administration officials have said they hope eventually to transfer or release many of the roughly 490 suspects now held at Guantánamo. As of February, military officials said, the Pentagon was ready to repatriate more than 150 of the detainees once arrangements could be made with their home countries.

But those arrangements have been more difficult to broker than officials in Washington anticipated or have previously acknowledged, raising questions about how quickly the administration can meet its goal of scaling back detention operations at Guantánamo.

....................................................................................

The military has so far sent home 267 detainees from Guantánamo after finding that they had no further intelligence value and either posed no long-term security threat or would reliably be imprisoned or monitored by their own governments. Most of those who remain are considered more dangerous militants; many also come from nations with poor human rights records and ineffective justice systems.


What implications, if any, are there for Australia and for David Hicks? Read the whole article and wait to see how the issues it discusses are reported in the Australian media.

Voices of War

Voices of War is a recently published book of 21 extracts from the Australians at War Film Archive, a project which has recorded interviews with over 2,000 Australians who were involved, not always in a frontline fighting capacity, in many wars, conflicts and peacekeeping operations.

The book only scratches the surface of the huge body of interview transcripts, which can be found on the Archive website.

While the project is undoubtedly of major importance some of the transcripts I've read have been very poorly proof read, especially many place names. For an example see this interview with a South Australian WW2 veteran, where, among other mistakes, Port Noarlunga is transcribed as "Port Malunga", Aldgate as "Mooregate" and a place in the Adelaide Hills is described as "Birdum"(any suggestions as to what this might be? It can't be the former terminus of the North Australia Railway).

The same page also has a photo of what is stated to be members of a platoon of the "2/4th" battalion, which should be "2/48th". Many veterans and others, especially South Australians, would be appalled at this error.

Michael Caulfield, the editor of the book and producer of the associated TV series, acknowledges that the interviewers were overworked and underpaid. Even so it should have been possible to enlist some volunteers, especially some with local knowledge, to assist with editing.

Another issue is addressed in the website

Some of the details recorded here may be distressing to users and family or friends of the persons interviewed. Users should also keep in mind that some materials may contain offensive language, depictions of sexual matters or negative stereotypes reflecting the culture or language of a period or place.

The material presented on this website is the memories and reflections of the person being interviewed. The material is presented in good faith, but does not reflect the considered views of the Department of Veterans' Affairs (DVA) or The Australians at War Film Archive (AAWFA).

Any access that you make of this website is undertaken at your own risk.

I wonder what, if any, say the interviewees had as to what was included or excluded from the transcripts, and whether they gave informed consent to their interview transcripts being put on the web. I'm not not suggesting censorship, but maybe a bit more sensitivity about what has been posted on the website.

Alida Valli

Last week Alida Valli, the renowned European actress, died. Her full name, according to her obituary in the London Times, was Baroness Alida Maria Laura Altenburger von Marckenstein Freunberg. Her career in films extended over almost 70 years: for details see her IMDb entry.

While her life had many vicissitudes if for nothing else she deserves to be remembered for her role as Anna Schmidt in The Third Man, and particularly for the final scene, as the Times obituarist so aptly describes it:

in one of cinema’s most memorable dénouements, Harry Lime’s girlfriend, Anna Schmidt, played by Alida Valli, walks away from his grave and the soft-hearted consolation offered by Holly Martins, choosing the memory of Lime’s cynical charm instead.

The movie is widely available on DVD. I recommend it highly.

Nothing but ...inconsistent customer service

In the last week I've experienced some very varied customer service.

Australia Post have been running a campaign "Nothing But Savings", with a brochure delivered to both my home (despite a "no junk mail" sign on the letter box) and my PO box (I don't know if it's possible to block junk mail to PO boxes), which offered, among other things, Olympus xD picture cards at a good price.

I went to Norwood PO and asked for one, only to be told "we don't have them, you'll have to go to a larger outlet". The counter clerk suggested that I should try in the CBD but otherwise made no effort to ascertain which, if any, other POs had the item available.

Next stop the CBD where, after a long wait in the queue at the City Cross PO, I was told by the clerk who served me that they had had none of the memory cards left. She did however take the trouble to locate some other POs which did have stocks (and this apparently required her to make phone calls rather than to consult an online database).

The contrast between the standards of service at the two outlets was amazing. What, if any, records does Australia Post keep of the stock at its outlets and what minimum standards of customer service does it expect from its staff?

The brochure did state "Not all products available in all outlets, limited stock, while stocks last" and invited people to visit the website www.auspost.com.au, but the website has nothing about the promotion let alone about which outlets hold stock of which items.

All this contrasted with my dealings with Dick Smith Electronics, who maintain a detailed database on their excellent website. From this you can obtain information about products, locate which stores have them in stock and how to order items online if that's your preference . Unlike Australia Post the standard of customer service is of a uniform high standard (if they don't have an item in stock they'll usually be able to get it for you), which gives me confidence to make them my first port of call for my electronic needs.

Slipping from Dizzy heights

Jason "Dizzy" Gillespie, having just made 201 not out for Australia in a test match against Bangladesh, returned home to Adelaide, turned out for his club side in the final and, batting in a tight situation, was dismissed for a duck.

Does this tell us anything about the relative standards of Adelaide district cricket and test matches involving Bangladesh, or is it only yet another example of the unpredictability of cricket?

Anzac Day

As usual on Anzac Day, the print media produced several pieces attempting to define what Anzac Day might (not does or should)mean to us now. One of the better ones was in in The Australian where Peter Ryan recounted a story from his war service which, when as he recollected it in relative tranquillity, produced a very different view of the fighting in New Guinea.

From the general point

The central meaning of Anzac Day is commemoration of the service and sacrifice of our warriors over several generations. This is a solemn rite, a time for hushed voices and private thoughts. The Returned and Services League rightly insists that the march be decorous and respectful. But to discourage the participation of veterans' descendants simply guarantees Anzac Day will fade away, and sooner rather than later.

he moves to a description of a specific incident which took place on or near Anzac Day 1943, which I invite you to read for yourself.

SBS documentary ruffles Turkish feathers

Tonight SBS TV screened a documentary on the Armenian Genocide, a large scale killing, chiefly in 1915, of Armenian citizens of the Ottoman empire by Turks.

I was surprised to see that SBS put a disclaimer at the end of the program and also on its website:

SBS will be screening The Armenian Genocide at 7.30pm AEST, Sat 22 April. After the program, have your say on the documentary here. The producers of the program acknowledge that there is controversy and debate surrounding the historical record of events.

Author Addison Whithecomb's advice may be an apt reminder to forum members:

"When you resort to attacking the messenger and not the message, you have lost the debate." :


IMO this was unnecessary as I don't see why we should have to walk on eggshells to avoid giving offence to those who disagreed with the view presented in the program.

I submitted this to the forum:

I was surprised to see the comment at the end of the program about some of the information presented possibly being disputed by Turkish people. They may feel that their position was not presented as they'd have liked, but so what? Many other contentious matters are discussed in the media without an automatic right of reply bring given to those who feel aggrieved.

I'm of northern European descent as far back as I can tell, so have no emotional involvement in the matter, but what I've read, including Samantha Power's "A Problem From Hell", Orhan Pamuk's "Red" and Robert Fisk's "The Great War for Civilisation", is enough to convince me that especially in 1915, the Turks killed large numbers of Armenians. Some images shown and some statements read in the documentary reinforced my views, which is not to say that I believe that Turkish people of today should have to bear a burden of guilt forever and a day: an acknowledgement that bad things were done would be a good next step for them to take.


For some unexplained reason it has not yet been published.

Howard family members support traditional English syllabus but Murdoch paper lets the side down

Here is a photo of the front page of today's Advertiser.

Note the sub-heading under the lead story with what may be a greengrocer's apostrophe attached to the PM's family name.

This solecism is not still on the website (if it ever was), but the text of the article by Bronwyn Hurrell is.

To me, reading between her lines (or should I say "deconstructing her text"?), at one point she seems to be implying that Mr and Mrs Howard are of one mind on these matters, and that that mind is Mrs Howard's, not the PM's:

Mr Howard, whose wife, Janette, is a former English teacher, said he felt "very, very strongly" about the criticism "that we are dumbing down the English syllabus".

Apart from this Ms Hurrell has rounded up a range of opinion from many of the usual local suspects, not all of whom are models of lucidity. For example Professor Reid of the University of South Australia mixes his metaphors (or cliches) "Every time there's the slightest change in education, it's a kneejerk response of accusing educators of dumbing down", while a "spokesman" for the education department

said SA "supports a curriculum that teaches reading, writing, grammar and communication and uses a range of texts, including traditional literature. It is vital that the enjoyment and value of reading is promoted to students."

See anything wrong with the last sentence?

This shows that, notwithstanding my suspicion of the PM's motives for raising the matter I have some sympathy for the Howards' (should it be Howards's?) position.

Anyway, for a more balanced view than theirs, read David Williamson's piece in Crikey. The first two paragraphs sum up his view:

I think John Howard's position is too absolutist, but being concerned about the way literature appears to be being taught is legitimate. In the mid-nineties I penned a satire directed at the excesses of postmodern literary theory called Dead White Males. It was a big box office success but drew the wrath of postmodern academics like the ones I had satirised.

I was accused of being deeply conservative and not understanding that the human consciousness is formed and controlled by the ideologies contained in "texts". The theory posited that so called imaginative fiction was no more than ideology promoting the national, class, race and gender positions of the author. What annoyed me about such a smug analysis was not that it didn't contain SOME truth, but that it was being taught as if it was a TOTAL truth.

Peter Craven in The Age also thinks along similar lines:

YOU don't have to agree with the Prime Minister about much else to think that he's on the side of the angels on this one.

"Postmodern" gets used to mean a lot of different things, but the worry that John Howard is reflecting (whether he understands it or not) is based on the postmodernist notion that everything is relative, that there is no aesthetic value that's not illusory, and that our kids might as well be studying any old aspect of pop culture — episodes of Neighbours, cartoons, you name it — rather than King Lear or the poetry of Keats.

Now, there's nothing necessarily wrong with people studying (preferably in media courses) the things they're going to entertain themselves with, but when it comes to literature, it's important that we hang on to the idea that some pieces of work have got more going for them than others.

It's crucially important that we don't lose our sense of the value of the literary classics. This doesn't have to be inert or set in stone. And, of course, we can only read Shakespeare or Joyce or whatever it is as people living now, but that shouldn't delude us into thinking that one thing's as good as another.

Diabolical

From yesterday's Age p22, appropriately in the "Mind Games" section.
Today the problem cum solution grid was reprinted at p16 as "Yesterday's solution".

A very modern model of a postmodernist Prime Minister

Today Mr Howard waded into the debate about English teaching in Australia with some trenchant comments:

"I share the views of many people about the so-called postmodernism ... I just wish that independent education authority didn't succumb on occasions to the political correctness that it appears to succumb to," he said.

"We all understand that it's necessary to be able to be literate and coherent in the English language, we understand that it's necessary to be numerate and we also understand that there's high-quality literature and there's rubbish.

"We need a curriculum that encourages an understanding of the high-quality literature and not the rubbish."

But the Sydney Morning Herald online puts the PM on the back foot by quoting Professor Margaret Sankey of the University of Sydney, who asserts that the PM's "moral relativism makes him postmodern":

"He takes lots of different moral standpoints on different occasions. It would be very hard to work out what his particularly moral unitary approach was, because there are core promises and non-core promises," Professor Sankey said.

"There's a lot of shading and ducking and weaving."

Professor Sankey said she didn't understand what Mr Howard meant when he criticised postmodernism in the classroom on ABC Radio in Brisbane earlier today.

"I'm at a bit of a loss to understand why he is saying that. I would really think between you, me and the gatepost that he didn't know what he was talking about."

But she said she didn't want to prejudge Mr Howard.

"I wouldn't like to presume what he knows; maybe he's a covert literary theoretician."

I'm intrigued by the black and white-ness of the PM's distinction between "high quality literature" and "rubbish". I'd like him to give some example of each and to indicate which of them he's actually read (or in the case of plays, seen performed).

George Orwell once wrote about an intermediate category called "good bad books". I'm sure most readers would be able to compile their own lists of books which fit somewhere in this grey area.

English cricket season begins with old head leading MCC to defeat

Nottinghamshire, last year's Division 1 champions, have just defeated the MCC by 142 runs in the traditional English first class cricket season opener. The score is here.

The MCC team is normally a showcase for promising young players. This year the selectors turned the clock back by choosing as captain John Stephenson ,a 41 year old who played a single test against Australia in 1989. Stephenson batted in the lower order and bowled a few overs at fifth or sixth change (though he did dismiss the last three opposition batsmen cheaply).

In many respects Mr Stephenson seems like an amateur captain from the gentleman and player days, chosen more for his social than his cricketing skills. The match was played at Lord's, so does this mean that he was able to use the amateur dressing room (surely it's still there), and maybe enter the field through a different gate from the rest of his team? Did the Notts players revert to the old custom of giving the opposition skipper one to get off the mark? It seems they may have done so in the first innings, where he made 1, but didn't in the second where he was dismissed without troubling the scorers.

Nottinghamshire also fielded a player who has admitted to using unconventional methods to prepare his spinning fingers for the rigours of bowling.

I wonder whether Shane Warne has ever tried it to assist his delivery?

News Ltd chooses quiet news day to publish criticism of government

On 12 April a public meeting was held in Adelaide to discuss the situation of David Hicks. The meeting was reported by Channel 9 and ABC's Lateline that day.

Mr Murdoch's local outlet, The Advertiser, has waited five days, until the last day of the Easter long weekend (hardly the busiest news day of the year), to comment by publishing seven letters about Hicks, all of them critical of the government and its handwashing. They are not available online but you can find them on page 17 of today's paper. Here are some extracts from the letters which were published:

- "Our government of course continues to exhibit a total lack of courage. Bring him home."

- "Guilty or not, we should take care of our own and not leave them 'hanging out to dry'".

- "Hicks might be a 'bad bastard', but he's our 'bad bastard'. More than a cosy e-mail from Minister Ruddock is needed to end this sickening treatment..."

- "Whatever his alleged crimes, David Hicks is entitled to a fair trial."

- "David Hicks is in a position that is a very poor advertisement for democracy and justice...It seems that his worst offence is that he made some stupid choices. For those choices he has been treated worse than a convicted terrorist."

- "Bush, Blair and Howard's combined victimisation of David Hicks knows no apparent bounds. They seem increasingly determined to thrust him through the mincer despite watching a disappointing series of their high-flown but unrealistic legal appeals and whatnot vanish before their eyes."

-"Messrs Bush, Blair and Howard unleashed a war that killed, or led to the killing of, tens of thousands of innocent people. Has David Hicks done anything as reprehensible as this?"

From the 7- 0 score it seems fair to assume that The Advertiser received no letters in support of the government's stand. How many other critical ones did it receive but not publish?

Stories from the outback

Two stories about the outback from the News Ltd website: the first "Outback survivor or fraud?" casts doubt on a man's claim that he survived 70 days in the desert.

Ricky Megee has told an amazing tale of his 70-day survival in the desert and says a diet of lizards, frogs, snakes and leeches kept him alive.
And Mr Megee, from Toowong, Queensland, has hit out at claims he is a liar. "People need to understand what I've been through; to have survived out there for so long and then be told I am making it up makes me sick," he said.

Mr Megee said his extraordinary ordeal began when he was hijacked on an isolated dirt road south of Halls Creek, drugged and left for dead in a shallow grave on January 24.He was found by station hands on April 4, weighing just 45kg and extremely malnourished, living in a makeshift shelter – a section of pipe – beside a dam on remote Birrindudu cattle station, near the WA border.

Initially he was heralded as a hero but police have voiced suspicions about parts of his story. Mr Megee says he is "no angel" and admits to a close association with a known NT drug dealer. He also said he was convicted of drug-related crimes in Queensland "about 10 years ago".

But he says his past has nothing to do with him being left for dead in one of the world's harshest environments."The police might not believe how I ended up there but nobody is saying that I wasn't lost in the bush; look at me, for God's sake," he said."I will take any lie detector test. I will eat frogs on camera to prove I did it out there. I couldn't make this up if I tried."

The second story revisits another outback mystery

It's good to see that Ms Lees' life is, as the headline says "full of promise". No doubt the prospect of good sales for her book (is it the fifth or sixth about the disappearance of Peter Falconio?) has contributed to this. I have some qualms about her (or any other victim of crime) being able to capitalise on their misfortune, but it's hard to know how to stop or even regulate it unless the money (or part thereof) victim writers earn from their books or media appearances are used to offset any victim of crime payment they may receive.

Bangladeshi media (mis)management

Cricinfo reports, with a graphic photo, on the alleged beating of a sports photographer by police which in turn led to the protest shown on the website and caused the start of the test to be postponed.

To put it into perspective, if this is any guide, the Bangladesh media faces many more serious challenges, not many of which are reported in the western media.

Update 17 April

Today's Australian reports on the events with the headline "Security drama mars Test start". The print, though not the online, version features a graphic photo of the police in action.

Poorly performing politicians prodded

Today's Sunday Mail reports that Mr Evans, the recently anointed Leader of the Opposition, plans to initiate a mentoring program for new MPs:

Opposition Leader Iain Evans has designed a program where new members are mentored about the workings of Parliament to help them tackle the expected onslaught from seasoned Government performers.

"We know we are in for a tough fight – we will have to operate a little bit differently," Mr Evans said yesterday.

"We have got 15 MPs in the Lower House and we need all of them operating to their best ability. Each new MP will be allocated an experienced member and they will actually sit with them through the legislative process, so they learn it as quickly as possible."

The Sunday Mail has done some researching of its own:

Official reports of debates in the 2004-2005 session of Parliament show the MPs least likely to speak during debates on legislation were Labor's Frances Bedford, Vini Ciccarello and Steph Key and Liberal MP Liz Penfold.

IMO it's a bit rough to judge them by just one criterion: for example Ms Bedford's official profile claims that she "is a Member or Participant of almost every Community Group in Florey [her electorate]. She has a particular interest in Education and Health issues, and in local bands and orchestras."

Ms Ciccarello's official profile is sketchy but she attends meetings such as the Council Forum held on 6 April, is often seen around Norwood Parade and is perceived by many of her constituents, especially those of ethnic background, to be supportive of their interests.

Ms Key was until the recent election the Minister responsible for the department I used to work for and, at least in the early days of her tenure, made an effort to meet as many of her staff as possible.

Ms Penfold represents a large district in the back country, and her profile and very detailed website hardly suggest that she is a slacker.

Unfortunately nobody has yet examined the contribution of the Legislative Council members. Many of them would be barely if at all known to their electors (all voters in the state).

This said, it would be good to establish some criteria for MP effectiveness: apart from contribution to debates and numbers of questions asked (many of which might be Dorothy Dixers) I'd suggest a good website with lots of information about matters such as grants and services. On this score Mrs Penfold would be near the top of the ratings.

SA on the wrong track

I've just come across this advertisement from The Hindu:

South Australia, a popular destination for higher studies

Unfortunately the government or its advertising agency didn't check the photo which shows a tram in Melbourne!

Whither cricket?

Sometimes it's easier to see things from outside the circle or on the margins than from the centre. So it seems to be with cricket, where, in the aftermath of Australia's pyrrhic victory over Bangladesh, the talk from the centre of the cricket universe is all of too many games putting pressure on the players rather than of the chinks in Australia's armour and Bangladesh's capabilities .

Anyway check out The Scotsman for a view from the margins and see if you agree that it makes some good points, such as this, made in response to the editor of Wisden's plea for the number of top level cricket playing nations to be reined in:

Geographically, Australia, South Africa, West Indies and India could not be further apart but no veil will disguise the fact their interest in cricket grew as a result of a common diaspora.

However, the beauty is that none of those countries today are remotely alike. Diametric cultures are reflected in the way they play the game. Urban bowls become fascinating melting pots when competition is fierce. Rivalries are formed, and 18-month gaps between series are just about bearable. Five or six years would be achingly long if the rest was just filler.

Hang on. That's what it has been in recent years. Over the past decade only one team, India, has made an Australian summer interesting, and before the Baggy Greens ambushed them at Lord's last year, England had won ten straight Tests at home. This is not the fault of the International Cricket Council, it is because two nations got their houses in order and others fell behind. Everything is cyclical. Not so long ago England were a shambles.

The trouble with cricket is that it takes too long. For a Test you have to write off five days, for a major tour three months. Sadly, it wasn't designed to cater for 205 countries, as football now does. Scotland are ranked 62nd by FIFA and 12th by the ICC, but the comparison means nothing because in football, quality opposition is only ever an hour away. Trips can be done in two days.

Fair go for David?

Another tier of the British legal system has confirmed that David Hicks meets the requirements for British citizenship. Only Britsh government opposition and , bureaucratic inertia(which may be the same) and US, and presumably Australian instransigence stand in the way of a settlement.

In the meantime David Hicks has been returned to solitary confinement or "single occupancy cell" as the spinners so disingenuously put it.

Last night I attended a meeting in North Adelaide where I took this photo of the speakers: from left to right David McLeod (Aust lawyer working with the Hicks legal team), Terry Hicks (David's father), Major Michael Mori USMC (DH's appointed military tribunal lawyer0 and Josh Dratel (high profile NY criminal lawyer who is working on the Hicks team pro bono) . Major Mori's face is blurred because he just doesn't know how to be still. Each person spoke and each shed some light on the dark areas of the case, though for various reasons they did not elaborate too much. for some reason only written questions on notice were allowed: in theory I don't have a problem with this provided supplementary questions from the floor are allowed, which they weren't.

One question elicited some books which David has been forbidden to receive: these include The Fatal Shore, Breaker Morant, Papillon, To Kill a Mockingbird, and (you guessed it) Presumed Innocent.

The media was there in some force and various outlets, including the ABC radio's AM and Lateline reported on the meeting and its aftermath. The latter was spoilt by Tony Jones's patronising bellowing at Terry Hicks.

The meeting did pass a resolution condemning the Australian government for its inadequate support of DH's rights. How much impact this has upon the government remains to be seen. I won't be expecting too much.

Kokoda

Movie buff though I am but I don't normally review movies here, yet will make an exception to my usual custom. Last night I went to a preview and Q & A session of Kokoda , a new Australian film about the WW2 fighting in New Guinea between the Japanese and Australian forces.

For more background information see here.

IMO the movie is a very good production (the visuals and sound are excellent) and very compelling viewing.

Alister Grierson, the director, who spoke at the Q & A after the movie (when the MC eventually let go of the microphone) said some interesting things, eg that Peter Weir was a major influence upon him. OK, there are obvious similarities to Gallipoli but the confined spaces of the rainforest made me think more of Terrence Malick's Thin Red Line, which was also filmed in Australia (though in North Qld as opposed to Mount Tamborine).

Other influences I noticed were WW2 newsreels and photos, esp Damien Parer's Kokoda Front Line! the 1942 doco which was the first Aust movie to win an Academy Award, and in the surrealistic opening scene a nod in the direction of The Passion of the Christ. Is this an oblique acknowledgement of Mel Gibson's role in portraying Australian archetypes (as in Gallipoli)?

Grierson also said that the movie was aimed at the pre-boomers. Unfortunately IMO it doesn't provide sufficient background detail for younger Australians to relate to it. This point was picked up in a recent 7.30 Report item.

Grieving now illegal in Mr Howards's new world

I blinked when I read this. Not so long ago I wouldn't have believed that this was possible.

UNIONS are set to mount a legal challenge after workers were docked four hours' pay for stopping work for 15 minutes to collect money for the family of an employee killed on a construction site.

The workers were docked for taking unprotected industrial action under the Government's new workplace legislation.

CFMEU organiser Martin Kingham said about 25 workers stopped for up to 15 minutes last Friday to take up a collection for the family of building worker Christos Binos, 58, who was fatally crushed by a concrete slab at Pakenham last month.

Employer Hooker Cochram said it was forced to dock the pay of workers as the unions had not given a detailed written request seeking the meeting.

"That wasn't complied with, so under the legislation we have no choice but to deduct four hours' pay for what is considered under the legislation industrial action," general manager Matthew Dalmau said.

Mr Dalmau said Hooker Cochram directly employed two of the construction workers refurbishing the Department of Defence building site at Port Melbourne, while the remainder were subcontractors.

He said the company could suffer sanctions or be fined up to $33,000 if it did not dock the pay.

"Of course we are sympathetic, of course we would have granted the approval for the meeting if the rules had been followed," Mr Dalmau said.

"Unfortunately, our hands are tied, we had no choice."

Mr Kingham said the stopwork meeting was not political or industrial, it was a tradition "about people in the building industry looking after each other".

"People have been penalised for trying to do the right thing," he said.

"We want to challenge the legality of this new law, we think this new law is nonsense.

"But whatever happens in the courts, we are not going to stop what we do, which is to help each other out when we are down."

The union had given notice of the meeting the day before, and presented a written letter about five minutes before the meeting, shop steward Steve Barum said.

Mr Barum said workers did not blame the employer, which had been directed to dock the pay and was protecting itself against fines or losing future government contracts.

He said the "un-Australian" legislation was taking away the Australian spirit of helping one another, while ACTU president Sharan Burrow said it denied a basic humanity to workers trying to look after each other.

The Federal Government today said the provisions for docking a minimum four hours' pay for unlawful industrial action were included in Work Choices legislation to stop "wildcat disruptions", or sudden strikes.

A spokeswoman for Workplace Relations Minister Kevin Andrews said it was disappointing that those involved in the action at Hooker Cochram had not contacted the Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC) before stopping work, but the taskforce had now been referred the matter to determine if it was considered unlawful industrial action.

"It may well be the case that this is not industrial action," the spokeswoman said.

"Regardless, under the provisions the employees can approach the employer to have an agreed period (of time off) for these matters.

"So what clearly can occur is an agreement between the employee and employer, or, for example, the activities could have taken place during lunchtime or morning tea."

Mr Kingham of the CFMEU, who has previously been depicted by the media as a machiavellian rabble rouser, deserves credit for supporting the 23 independent contractors as well as the two unionists who took an unauthorised 15 minutes off to take up a collection on behalf of their fellow-worker who died on the job.

Poetry matters

I've never been an avid poetry reader, but my eye has been caught recently by two poetry related matters.

On Saturday the Weekend Australian published a story about Les Murray, who has just published The Biplane Houses, his latest collection. The print version featured a couple of poems which the online version omitted.

Also of interest to me at the moment, not least because it actually publishes poetry online, is the Poem-a day celebration sponsored by the US publishing house Alfred A Knopf which runs throughout April. If you sign up you receive a daily email with a poem.

You can read them all here. For what it's worth here is my personal selection of three of the first ten: Jane Mayhall's "Never Apologize, Never Explain" , Philip Levine's "today and Two Thousand Years from Now" and Lucie Brock-Broido's "After the Grand Perhaps".

Ms Mayhall should be an inspiration to everyone of mature years. The notes on the website explain :

Jane Mayhall is a poet of a now bygone bohemian New York. She wrote much of her first full-length collection, SLEEPING LATE ON JUDGMENT DAY, after she had already turned eighty. Throughout the work, we find insights into a life well-lived, especially in today's poem, "Never Apologize, Never Explain."

Local democracy in action

On Thursday I went to the "Free Public Forum" for Norwood, Payneham and St Peters residents.

Here are some observations and comments:

Present

Mayor Bria; Councillors Dottore, Duke, Kleanthi, Marcetucci, Minney, Moore, Pasalidis, Stock, Whitington, Winderlich and Wormald; several council staff including CEO Barone for some of the time; the MP for Norwood Vini Ciccarrello, and about 60-70 others ( I didn't count them but in any event it was difficult to distinguish between council staff and others).

Moderator and meeting management

The MC/ Moderator was Alan Shepherd(?) who did a good job by setting and generally sticking to some simple ground rules such as (1) asking everybody to limit their questions to a minute and (2) setting a fixed finishing time. I thought it was reasonable to only allow one question per person at a time, but was disappointed that I wasn't given an opportunity to ask another of my questions after everyone else had had a go: perhpas I should have just gone up and grabbed the microphone as someone else did!

Councillors' performance

Apart from the absentee councillors (no apologies were reported, so draw your own conclusions about this) some councillors said nothing, others little while the three W s (councillors Whitington, Winderlich and Wormald) impressed with their grasp of a range of topics and their openness to fresh ideas.

Is confession good for Christian's soul?

On Friday The Independent Weekly's Indaily newsletter accused Crikey's Christian Kerr of lifting one of its stories without attribution:

Open letter to Crikey: Dear Christian Kerr, Insider loves that old adage about imitation and sincere flattery. We also feel independent media sources like ours should certainly stick together. So thanks for using yesterday's Indaily item - The Travelling Wortleys - in today's Crikey. Insider's pleased you liked it so much you used it almost word for word. But does New Media mean we give up that old-fashioned practice of citing each other? Please join us, however, in apologising to the Wortleys for getting their son's age wrong - we've been told he's actually younger.

I'm looking forward to Crikey's response.

Katherine floods: are the authorities on top of the situation?

From the ABC website today at 1:48pm:

Emergency services in the Northern Territory town of Katherine have acknowledged several houses in the town could have water up to their roofs.Last night Counter Disaster Commander Kate Vanderlaan said she had no reports of severe damage to homes.

Today she acknowledged as many as 12 houses in the north of the town could be covered up to their roofs.

At 8:30 am AEST today the ABC website posted this:

Katherine residents have woken up to uncertainty about the water levels in the flooded town.Authorities were saying the river had peaked overnight, but is now expected to reach 19.2 metres at the Katherine River bridge later this morning.This conflicts with advice from police and the weather bureau that the river peaked overnight....Overnight the weather bureau said the water level at the bridge was slowly falling but police now expect the water to go up.

Lee was travelling through Katherine when the roads closed and spent the night on a camp bed in the high school gym.He says he feels uncertain about today.

"Regular updates would be a big improvement on things at the moment, we're sort of in the dark," he said."Unless you crowd around the radio nobody knows what's going on."

To its credit the Northern Territory News has not ducked the issue:

Commander Kate Vanderlaan conceded last night that the initial assessment of the Katherine Region Counter Disaster Planning Committee just hours prior to the evacuation of the town may have been incorrect.

She said her statement at an 8am press conference that the ``urgency is not there at the moment'' was based on a glitch in the system that measured the height of floodwaters at Katherine Gorge _ the driving force behind the massive flow.

``The level of flooding was slightly surprising,'' she said.

``But at least the gorge is going down now.''

And now, another ABC website posting at 6:00pm AEST, including this

Emergency services in flood-stricken Katherine say the flooding could have been been better managed but they are relatively happy with how information was communicated.Authorities in Katherine waited until late yesterday morning to sound the evacuation siren prompting an exodus from the north, south and centre of the town.

Resident Laurel Martin says the alarm could have been raised sooner. "A lot of them say they didn't have a lot of warning this time," she said.

But resident Ray Newman disagrees."I think they had plenty of warning around the place here and I think Katherine was pretty prepared for it," he said.

Counter-disaster commander Kate Vanderlaan says the shelters had to be ready before the sirens triggered evacuations.
"It could've been better, anything could've been better," she said.

No further comment.

Local democracy in action

Tonight the local council is holding a public forum, to which I am going.

I will be asking about three matters:

1. Why the council precludes residents affected by proposed significant developments (in the plain English, not the planners', meaning of that term) from being heard when the matter is before the Development Assessment Panel.

2. Why the council does not provide elected members with appropriate support, particularly IT support (including internet and email facilities), to enable them to interact more effectively with their electors.

3. Why the council has not cut the protruding branch of the tree shown in this photo, despite my asking twice in the last few months (and both times being assured by council staff that it would be done).

I will report here on what happens.

More on those cartoons and US-Israel relations

Today's Australian has two items which caught my eye: an opinion piece by John Birmingham "Cartoonists are not in the foreign service" and a Cut and Paste digest of three comments on that LRB/ Harvard article on US-Israel relations (see my post on 4 April).

Birmingham's piece IMO is eminently sensible. Here's an extract:

Alexander Downer, The Sydney Morning Herald and other sanctimonious critics should lighten up: Bill Leak was right about Indonesia's treatment of West Papua...When Leak sat down to frame his full colour, and slightly off-colour, reply, he was simply doing what he does as well as any editorial cartoonist in the world, spinning a witty and - ahem - penetrating joke off a developing news story. Leak's role is not to further Australian national interests, to salve wounded egos or to make life easier for the likes of Howard or Yudhoyono.

The three commentators quoted in Cut and Paste are also drawing (or redrawing) well marked lines in the sand regarding their respective positions. Eliot Cohen in the Washington Post (for the full article see here) gets really worked up about the attack: "Yes, It's Anti-Semitic" is the headline in the original . Michael Ledeen from the National Review Online (full article here) writes in similar vein: "This is anti-Semitism in the grand tradition".

Mark Mazower in the Financial Times (full article only available on subscription) takes the contrary view, which is closer to mine:

Brandishing the big stick of anti-Semitism against all and sundry helps no one: it lumps together serious critique with crackpot ravings, does a signal disservice to those who really suffered from it in the past and stifles a badly needed debate within the US. There is no reason why the partnership between the US and Israel should not be susceptible to the same kind of cost-benefit analysis as any other area of policy. After all, no special relationship lasts forever: ask the Brits.

I like his distinction between serious critique and crackpot ravings. I've heard some comments which tend towards the latter at question times at Robert Fisk presentations, but that doesn't make me think that Fisk or the authors of the paper should be silenced.