For example:
- An incisive Four Corners on problem gambling.
- An opinion piece in The Australian by Tim Costello and Nick Xenophon
- A story "Pub with no pokies may close" in The Australian
- A proposal by South Sydney Rabbitohs Rugby League club owners Russell Crowe and Peter Holmes A'Court to remove the club's 160 poker machines, though not without opposition from other members. The story also ran on both the7.30 Report and Lateline tonight.
Even The Advertiser, in an editorial ( online at Adelaide Now) couldn't resist a comment, despite the matter being sub judice:
Gaming machines are programmed to pick the pockets of people who play them. Played for any length of time, the machines cannot lose. So when a SkyCity Casino patron discovered that an apparently dodgy machine was paying almost at will, could you blame him for taking the winnings?
We do not presume to comment on guilt or innocence. The law must take its course in this case, which is now before the courts. But it would somehow be nice if the justice system recognised the irony of the gambling David who took on Goliath and - at least for a few delicious minutes - appeared to win.
I'm not much of a gambler. I've never wagered very much at a time, and I've never spent a cent on gambling or entertainment of any kind at the local casino. Even so, I don't think gambling should be banned: doing so would drive it back underground where it was years ago . Nevertheless there's a strong case for regulating it more, especially trying to identify and restrain "problem gamblers". How that might be done I'm not sure but I hope that the media attention of the last couple of weeks will produce more than the "match struck in the darkness", as Tim Costello described it on Lateline tonight.
No comments:
Post a Comment